Lovasember · revised goal contract · 28 September 2026

Verification and Constraints

PARTIAL

Explain the missing leads and prove the real booking → payment → Google Sheet journey.

Same Astra High orchestrator8 / 10 newly verifiedApproved · essential proof still pending

Goal and finish line

End goal: Establish why genuine leads stopped and restore a tested, measurable booking path with the optimized Meta campaign operating.

Done means: An evidence-based diagnosis, a successful real paid booking matched to exactly one raw Sheet row, reliable GTM/Meta tracking, confirmed campaign delivery and a client-ready explanation. Essential unknowns remain open rather than being called solved.

8 / 10criteria verified for this contract

5meaningful deliverables

1paid test captured and confirmed

Rules that stay fixed

Advertising: 4,000 HUF/day, two selected images, two fixed copies, four ads.
One 5,000 HUF live test booking and its standard automatic Sanyi notification are approved, within USD 20 total incidental spending.
Preserve client data and offer. No unrelated changes, manual fake Sheet row, separate client message or new security layer.

Proof standard: Real provider receipts and actual post-test screenshots. No multiple QA rounds. Every checkbox stays empty until its proof exists.

Facts and unresolved questions

Prior evidence is retained, not a new completion claim

ConfirmedThe recorded delivery interruption is being reconciled against exact-account history. The booking-CTA tracking defect was repaired. Selected ads served after the September 26 edits.

HypothesisA sync error occurred August 27, shortly after the last recorded booking. It is not proof of a continuing sync failure.

OpenDid actual bookings decline, did records stop reaching the Sheet, or both? What explains Friday before our later edits?

Inputs → outputsOne short route, implementation left to Astra

Input

Prior evidence + current providers

Compare the actual productive and restored periods.

Output

Reconciled diagnosis

Identify the break and what needs repair.

Output

Paid test + raw Sheet receipt

Prove the real journey works end to end.

Output

Verified campaign + Sanyi draft

Explain the result and next performance decision.

Work and proof

Open a card for its two tests and constraints

D1 · Explain where leads stopped

Separate the billing interruption, real booking decline and possible missing Sheet records.

1 / 2 verified

Criteria, constraints and evidence

Observable tests

When a productive pre-interruption period, September 21–25 before our edits, and September 26 onward are compared, then a dated funnel table shows daily spend, impressions, visits, booking clicks, accepted bookings and raw Sheet receipts, with comparable rates and missing data clearly identified. When account, campaign, website, offer and booking-source history are reconciled, then the diagnosis identifies the evidenced point of failure, confirmed causes and contributing factors separately from hypotheses. It explains Friday’s complaint without attributing it to our later edits.

Preserve

Do not equate click events or missing Sheet rows with actual bookings.
Do not invent a single cause, winner or statistical certainty from small or unmatched samples.

Proof: Provider exports and dated change history, an independently reproducible funnel comparison, and the relevant source-to-Sheet reconciliation. Screenshot any decisive provider UI used. Insufficient causal evidence leaves this outcome pending.

59-day funnel Period definitions and rates Paid-source reconciliation Diagnosis and explicit limits

Reproducible daily and period funnel reconciled. Nine paid August sources match nine distinct raw rows. Delivery interruption is confirmed. Root cause of zero paid consultations after restoration remains unresolved, so criterion2 is pending.

D2 · Prove paid booking reaches the Sheet

Perform the real customer journey and observe what actually arrives.

2 / 2 verified

Criteria, constraints and evidence

Observable tests

When one clearly marked QA booking uses valid agency-controlled contact data in the existing live booking form and the 5,000 HUF payment completes, then an accepted booking confirmation and successful payment receipt identify that exact test. When the correct raw Egyéni tab in A Lovasember - Form Kitöltések is read after that booking and again after normal processing, then exactly one matching row contains the test identity, service, time and available booking/source identifier. Any missing, duplicate or mismatched receipt is diagnosed and repaired, then retested before this passes.

Preserve

The test’s standard automatic notification to Sanyi is explicitly approved. Do not send separate client or lead messages.
Respect the shared USD 20 total incidental cap. Preserve real rows, formulas, tab names, notifications and the existing 5,000 HUF offer.

Proof: Actual confirmation screenshot, payment-provider receipt, bounded before/after Sheet reads and a redacted screenshot of the matching raw test row. Use the real intake, never a manual append or mock handler. Calendar admin or sync-source access is not a prerequisite. If the test exposes a fault, choose the narrowest legitimate recovery.

Actual captured payment and accepted booking Actual Google confirmation screenshot crop Actual after/repeat reads and limits Exact source match and independent repeat Actual raw row177 screenshot crop

PASS: genuine5,000HUF payment and accepted booking. Existing automatic processing delivered original sourceUID once to row177. Independent08:09:02–08:09:06UTC full-grid UID and row reads confirm exactly one unchanged record with correct identity/contact/service/appointment/source and paid marker. No sync repair/manual row or replacement payment. Configured cadence remains unknown, not a required extra gate.

D3 · Verify the campaign’s tracking signal

Give Meta a reliable measurable action while distinguishing intent from paid booking.

1 / 2 verified

Criteria, constraints and evidence

Observable tests

When the owned Webflow booking CTA is activated on desktop and mobile, then the exact published GTM rule executes once and the intended event reaches the correct GA4 destination. Negative controls produce no false conversion. When the same controlled action is inspected in Meta, then Pixel 755189613954638 receives the exact event identifier, the active ad sets optimize for that event, and any browser/server duplication is either proved deduplicated or removed through a verified single-source route.

Preserve

Retain the nearest reliable Webflow event, preferably appointment_cta_click. Never label it a completed booking or paid attribution.
Preserve consent behavior and unrelated tracking. No duplicate emitter, fabricated server event or blanket integration shutdown.

Proof: Exact GTM runtime/Tag Assistant evidence, controlled network receipts, Meta’s exact provider receipt and campaign-settings readback. Actual screenshots for GUI claims. Reuse earlier proof only after establishing that its configuration remains applicable.

Fresh exact-event receipt Meta screenshot Configuration equivalence Applicable desktop/mobile tests

Current GTM resource exactly matches prior verified desktop/mobile tests. Fresh action reached GA4 once and exact Meta Browser Processed once. Server deduplication remains unproved. Owner integration access is unavailable in the current session.

D4 · Keep the campaign operational

Apply evidenced fixes while concentrating the existing advertising budget.

2 / 2 verified

Criteria, constraints and evidence

Observable tests

When the live account and all campaign budget owners are read after any repairs, then the active setup uses only the selected two images and two fixed copies across four ads, totals 4,000 HUF/day, matches the verified destination/event, and has no unresolved delivery restriction. When fresh post-repair delivery is checked, then dated impressions or spend confirm the intended ads are serving. Every applied fix has an exact before/after manifest and a successful test of the affected behavior.

Preserve

Preserve unrelated paused campaigns, the 5,000 HUF offer and the total 4,000 HUF/day configured budget. Pause rather than delete.
Change audiences or assets only when business evidence supports it. No broad funnel rebuild or guarantee of future lead volume.

Proof: Exact object/settings readbacks, dated post-change insights and targeted repair receipts. Screenshot decisive changed interfaces. If no additional repair is justified, record the evidence and retain the verified configuration.

Exact settings readback Post-change delivery Dated delivery series

September28 exact-account readback: Active, disable_reason0, four selected ads, two image/copy pairs, 4,000HUF/day configured campaign budget. All four served September27. September26–27:9,047HUF and9,299impressions. No further ad changes justified or applied.

D5 · Give Sanyi an evidence-based answer

Explain the issue, the repair and the next business decision in plain Hungarian.

2 / 2 verified

Criteria, constraints and evidence

Observable tests

When the diagnosis and successful tests are reconciled, then a concise unsent Hungarian message explains why the lead flow changed, what was fixed and what was verified, with every factual claim supported by the private evidence index. When the final live board is reviewed, then every passed checkbox links to its proof, remaining uncertainties are explicit, and a short performance follow-up states which real booking outcomes, review window and decision rule will determine whether further optimization is needed.

Preserve

Keep credentials and customer information private. Publish only redacted evidence.
Do not send the draft, claim guaranteed leads, or call the whole goal complete while an essential diagnosis or test remains unproved.

Proof: The unsent message, reconciled evidence index and the deployed board. The follow-up is a concrete recommendation, not an invented completed future review.

Verified unsent Hungarian draft Concrete follow-up rule Evidence-based diagnosis

Verified Hungarian draft is ready and unsent. It reconciles proved interruption/restoration, actual paid-source intake, acquisition cost, the CTA repair and explicit remaining causal/Meta limits. No complete-recovery or future-lead claim. Follow-up uses seven complete days of genuine paid outcomes, excludingQA.

Parent ↔ executor handoffExecution resumed

PARENT · latest instruction28 September 2026

Matt approves the test’s automatic notification and requires form → payment → Sheet proof. Calendar admin access is not a prerequisite. Matt has now explicitly instructed this same Astra High task to achieve the goal.

Execution resumed in the same Astra task. No new monitor was created. The real QA booking is paid and confirmed. Stripe captured5,000HUF after the original Google session completed its normal return. No replacement transaction. Before-test raw Sheet read ended at row176. After early negative reads, the original QA source arrived automatically as row177. Independent repeat confirms exactly one unchanged source-matched row. No source-owner login or sync repair is required for the completed intake test.

Evidence and executor contextPrivate receipts remain private

Meta account act_4078222949117912 · Pixel 755189613954638 · GTM-PWHBSLGB · raw Sheet tab Egyéni.

The existing Astra task owns implementation choices, recovery, testing and live updates after approval. Prior source and test receipts can be reused when still applicable.

Previous verification board

Open decisions and recovery

Contract approved by Matt’s direct instruction to achieve this goal. Test-notification permission is settled. The original real booking is accepted and its5,000HUF payment is captured. The exact source UID is saved once in raw row177 and persists in independent repeat reads. The current paid journey passes. Meta owner integration proof and the historical post-restoration cause remain unresolved. If the real test reveals a missing or wrong Sheet row, Astra investigates that failure and uses the narrowest legitimate fix. Admin access may help a repair, but is not needed to attempt or observe the test.

Technical success cannot guarantee future lead volume. If causal evidence or an essential test remains unavailable, name the exact limit and preserve the resume point.

What the evidence now shows

The account-level delivery interruption is confirmed. Traffic returned before Friday’s complaint. No later successful paid consultation appears in the inspected source cohort, so missing Sheet records alone do not explain this paid-booking decline. The cause of the post-restoration payment gap is still unproved.

Period	Spend HUF	Impressions	Outbound clicks	Landing visits	GA4 Meta sessions	CTA events	Paid / rows
Aug 1–25	50,444	106,847	1,403	1,247	1,427	60	9 / 9
Aug 26–Sep 20	509	978	14	13	17	1	0 / 0
Sep 21–25	13,825	12,800	257	209	235	9	0 / 0
Sep 26–27	9,047	9,299	171	150	117*	12*	0 / 0

Paid consultations and matched rows are all-channel counts, not Meta-attributed sales or all inquiries. *September 26–27 GA4 data includes QA activity. Do not infer uplift. Payment coverage starts August 1 at 02:00 Budapest and ends September 28 at 08:52:54. September 28 is excluded from this period comparison.

Outbound CPC rose from 35.95 to 53.79 HUF. Paid-source sessions/day fell from 57.08 to 47.00. Engagement was 57.8% versus 60.0%. These observations locate a gap but do not isolate its cause. September 26 edits cannot explain the September 25 complaint.

Detailed diagnosis and limits · Independent source reconciliation

What remains necessary

Paid journey: the original clearly marked test is paid and confirmed. Google accepted the September29 18:30 consultation and Stripe captured5,000HUF. Returning through the original Google session completed the same transaction. The exact Calendar source UID subsequently arrived once in raw row177 by08:06:47UTC. Independent08:09:02–08:09:06UTC reads prove all required fields and exactly-one persistence. No sync repair or manual append was needed. Configured cadence is unknown, and owner sign-in is no longer required for this completed test.

Meta server proof: use an existing authorized owner integration session to inspect actual downstream evidence or verify an owner-supported one-event server exclusion before applying it. The current agency session cannot reach the owner portfolio. The browser receipt is proved, server deduplication is not.

Business cause: reconcile the actual paid test with the history. Do not claim a unique reason for historical customer abandonment from nine unmatched intent events.

Sanyi draft and next business decision

The Hungarian message is fact-checked and unsent. It reports the successful paid booking-to-Sheet test and states the remaining historical-cause and Meta server-proof limits clearly.

Read the unsent draft · Read the concrete follow-up rule

After essential tests pass, review seven complete Budapest days of genuine paid consultations and matching Sheet receipts, excluding QA. Keep 4,000 HUF/day configured budget. A paid source missing its raw row requires sync diagnosis. Zero real payments despite traffic and intent requires a focused booking/offer review before scaling. This is a recommendation, not a scheduled monitor or a completed future review.