# Report

Status: DONE

## Result

Reviewed all five contracts and the relevant copied implementation interfaces. The ownership split is workable, but recommend the four bounded corrections below before parallel execution. No production goal was executed and no contract or implementation was edited.

## Deliverables and checks

| Deliverable | Requirement or verification | Result | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| This report | Review all five ownership scopes and integration responsibilities | PASS | Read README, SHARED and all five GOAL files in full. The module write partitions do not overlap. |
| This report | Inspect variant, participant and state interfaces | PASS | Read relevant `flow.js`, `app.js`, email destinations, confirmation links and canvas integration code. Findings 1–2. |
| This report | Check frozen-source assumptions and downstream copy dependencies | PASS | Recomputed SHA-256 for all 297 baseline-manifest files: zero missing files and zero mismatches. All six original module texts exist. Finding 3 concerns later edits, not missing inputs. |
| This report | Check local handoff versus deployed completion | PASS | Compared each completion section with SHARED and CAN3. Finding 4. |
| This report | Return at most seven consequential, actionable findings without implementation or visual QA | PASS | Four ranked findings. No browser, deployment, external write, additional agent or original-executor transcript inspection. |

## Ranked findings

### 1. P1: The required retained storage names defeat isolation on the shared host

**Contract:** [SHARED.md:52](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/plans/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/SHARED.md:52), “Existing browser-local stores … Retain them.” The old reference and new destination both use `review.clientsflow.hu` under different paths.

**Concrete seam:** [flow.js:1](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/outputs/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/site/flow/flow.js:1) reads/writes `kl-journey-20261002-funnel`. [app.js:3](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/outputs/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/site/app/app.js:3) uses `komplex-journey-20261002-demo-v1`, and line 4 uses IndexedDB `komplex-journey-20261002-videos-v1`. Browser storage is scoped to the origin, not the URL path. Under this contract the new canvas can inherit an old simulated purchase, participant reflections or feedback, and its edits can alter the old demo's stored state. Filesystem isolation does not prevent this.

**Correction:** Preserve the existing storage model and participant/day schema, but give this assembled run one new stable namespace for both localStorage keys and the video database. Agent03 owns the flow key and Agent04 owns course/video names. Do not clear or automatically rewrite the old namespace. Add one same-origin isolation check: seed old-demo state, run the new journey, and verify both builds retain their own state.

### 2. P1: Feedback emails lack a complete participant, fragment and received-state handoff

**Contract:** [SHARED.md:48–52](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/plans/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/SHARED.md:48) preserves the participant query “for the course,” while [03-flow FL3](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/plans/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/03-flow/GOAL.md:42) requires feedback emails to “point to received feedback.” The interface agreement freezes filenames but does not freeze the feedback fragment or say how email previews retain the participant and reach a valid received state.

**Concrete seam:** All 14 existing `daily-feedback-NN` destinations in [emails.json](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/outputs/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/site/flow/emails.json) are `../app/day-NN.html#feedback-current`, without a participant. [flow.js:57](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/outputs/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/site/flow/flow.js:57) emits that destination unchanged. [app.js:5](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/outputs/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/site/app/app.js:5) defaults a missing participant to `primary`. Thus a `sample-b` feedback preview currently links into the primary participant's screen, and opening the email alone does not create a legitimate received response. Agent03 cannot repair app-owned state directly.

**Correction:** Add a small shared interface rule: email previews accept/preserve `participant=primary|sample-b`; all course-bound links forward it; Agent04 preserves `#feedback-current`. A feedback preview links to an existing same-participant/day response, with an honest missing-state fallback or an explicit app-owned sample setup. An email click must not fabricate feedback or a submission. Check one received response through the email link for each participant, and validate all 14 destination IDs/fragments.

### 3. P2: Independent readiness can leave daily emails describing an earlier lesson arrangement

**Contract:** [SHARED.md:22](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/plans/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/SHARED.md:22) allows grouping and headings to improve. Agent04 owns `app/lessons.json`. [03-flow:14](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/plans/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/03-flow/GOAL.md:14) tells Agent03 to read the existing lesson data, while [SHARED.md:59–61](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/plans/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/SHARED.md:59) allows each owner to finish independently. The final CAN3 check names day-pair links/source mappings, but does not expressly revalidate email task wording against the final course data.

**Concrete seam:** [lessons.json](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/outputs/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/site/app/lessons.json) contains day title, summary, focus, recording instruction and source mapping. The 42 guide/reminder/feedback topics duplicate this meaning in independently owned email copy. Both owners could pass their local checks at different times while leaving a mismatched task or recording request in the final journey. Frozen original module bytes do not freeze the editable daily arrangement.

**Correction:** Agent04 reports the final `lessons.json` hash and any changed day IDs in its existing handoff. Agent03 records which lesson hash its daily messages were checked against. Agent05 compares these after both handoffs are ready and rechecks only affected topics if they differ. Keep the parallel start and reuse the existing files/manifests; no new planning artefact is needed.

### 4. P2: Agent05 inherits local-handoff wording despite being the final publisher

**Contract:** [05-canvas:56](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/plans/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/05-canvas/GOAL.md:56) says, “A manifest marked ready means this owned UI works and its local checks pass. The publisher performs the final deployed acceptance.” This is useful for Agents01–04, but the publisher is Agent05 itself. [CAN3](/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/KomplexLogopédia/plans/rita-ui-parallel-20261002/05-canvas/GOAL.md:42) separately requires actual deployed screenshots, public readback and comment persistence.

**Correction:** Keep local-ready completion for Agents01–04. Replace only Agent05's boilerplate with an explicit final rule: its `ready` manifest and `DONE` require the CAN1–CAN3 checks against the released build, including the independent postdeployment review and outer-comment readback. A locally working assembled canvas remains unfinished for Agent05. This removes ambiguity without adding a new gate or check.

## Limits or consequential decisions

This was a contract and source-interface review, not a visual or live-site verdict. The daily-feedback pilot override, frontend-only boundary, source-wording protection, inventory counts, sole publisher and outer-only comments are already stated clearly. The required landing kit and source references are present in the copied baseline. No additional council, asset generation, broad research, approval step or evidence dashboard is recommended.