# Parent comparison: image 060

Parent: /root, local task 01a0e067-c27c-77f2-a3f9-ec52a44b62cf. Fresh describer: /root/blind_060, gpt-6-luna high, forked with no conversation context. Its only evidence input was this image. Parent read the completed description and verified the image checksum.

[Actual screenshot](../inputs/060.png) · [Independent description](../descriptions/060.md)

Variant B. Captured action: Existing CRM reminder rescheduled and reopened. URL: https://kertujitok-proposal-b-20260927.clientsflowdigital.workers.dev/panel/proposals/?proposal=p_27930ae7c9b19eb3e18e978b21a93d85ebebdd9738c1d6df96c09bec12c76769. Screenshot SHA256: `c6bad22d5cae4f337fb6ed18203bde329256f4986d1ed9aaf19e66a5169495f0`.

- C21: When Péter edits either note, the reminder date, work-delivery date or calendar-note checkbox and reloads, then the same values appear in the integrated sidebar and the existing CRM fields retain their intended meanings.

**Parent comparison:** The description sees B's existing-contact reminder moved to October 12, with the separate work/delivery field blank and calendar visibility unchecked. The before/after reminder receipt verifies exactly one upcoming reminder at the new date. This deliberately different lead state confirms the fields retain separate meanings rather than being populated by inferred calendar behavior.

[Completed GUI journeys and exact behavioral evidence](../../deployed-gui/scenario-matrix.md). Full criterion acceptance also requires the other applicable states and nonvisual checks. A screenshot alone does not prove persistence, timing, arithmetic or downloaded bytes.
