# Parent comparison: image 004

Parent: /root, local task 01a0e067-c27c-77f2-a3f9-ec52a44b62cf. Fresh describer: /root/blind_004, gpt-6-luna high, forked with no conversation context. Its only evidence input was this image. Parent has read its completed description and checked the image checksum.

[Actual screenshot](../inputs/004.png) · [Independent description](../descriptions/004.md)

Variant A. Captured action: A-specific address and manual sent status after reload. URL: https://calendar-stage-20260923.cfd-staging.com/panel/proposals/?proposal=p_443dad7593c038b05e49b75dd468c49678d8df6676ec2b69cd96308c84bc1ca0. Screenshot SHA256: `7fdea72775965defa56a42039e084f6c2bf14aaed975aafce060ff5b055dd6e0`.

- C02: When the Test Garden lead and proposal are edited and saved in variant A, then those changes survive a reload in A while the same starting records in variant B remain unchanged. When the edits are repeated in B and interleaved with A saves, then each variant retains its own distinct saved values and never overwrites the other.
- C04: When Péter searches Ajánlatok for Test Garden and opens its row, then the correct saved proposal opens with its current totals, draft/sent label and document history.

**Parent judgment: the described visible state supports its named evidence contribution.** The description sees the A-specific saved address, manual sent status and saved-state message. This supports the stored A editor state for C02/C04. It does not imply that a message was sent. Paired C02 browser interleaving and exact readback independently establish isolation, and the document-history screenshot/receipt supplies C04 history evidence.

[Completed GUI journeys and exact behavioral evidence](../../deployed-gui/scenario-matrix.md). [Source mapping without customer identity](../../source-mapping-sanitized.json). Full criterion acceptance also requires the other variant and its nonvisual checks. A screenshot is not treated as proof of persistence, timing, arithmetic or downloaded bytes.