RUNNINGExecutor: Sol Medium9 / 22 criteria verified

Verification and Constraints

One Get Leads skill. A method you can review, a live table you can edit, and a first-100 trial backed by evidence.

End goal

Create one dependable /get-leads skill that turns existing leads or a reviewed sourcing request into evidence-backed, editable Hungarian personalisations, with durable feedback and a verified first-100 trial.

End state

A fresh task can discover /get-leads, understand its inputs, open the method-review page, process the approved sample and preserve corrections across reload, devices and resume. One review hub links the installed skill, live results, run history and actual verification evidence. Every source candidate has an honest outcome. Material failures are fixed and retested before completion.

Current item: execution. Matt authorized the skill build and first-100 trial on 22 September. Sol Medium is running.

What Sol must deliver

One working /get-leads entry point.
Live review, saved corrections and run history.
First-100 trial, issues fixed and retested.

Boundaries to review

$15 shared paid budget.
No campaign changes or messages.
Sol reviews the trial method only; future runs retain human review.

End goal system

Normal use of the completed skill. Green means a confirmed requirement, not a completed implementation.

Confirmed requirementAssumption to verifyOpen / not yet achieved

flowchart TD I["Inputs Existing leads or sourcing request"]:::confirmed --> M["Method page Filters, prompts, examples"]:::confirmed M --> H M --> G{"Human review Acknowledge saved method"}:::confirmed G -->|Revise| M G -->|Approved| P["Sample up to 100 Scrape → fit → personalise"]:::confirmed P --> T["Live review table Evidence and editable rows"]:::confirmed T --> F{"Human feedback Correct or accept sample"}:::confirmed F -->|Corrections| T F -->|Accept sample / finish| H F -->|Authorize remainder| R["Remaining candidates Same reviewed method"]:::confirmed T --> H["Durable history Reuse evidence and corrections"]:::confirmed R --> H classDef confirmed fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#2E7D32,color:#000 classDef assumption fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#C2185B,color:#000 classDef open fill:#FFFFFF,stroke:#94A3B8,color:#000,stroke-dasharray:5 5

Inputs → method page → your review.
Revise the method or approve a sample up to 100.
Scrape → fit → personalise → live review table.
Correct the sample, finish here, or authorize the remainder.
History begins with the method page and retains evidence, decisions and corrections.

Route to the end state

One pinned Sol Medium owner. Its independent reviewer can challenge wording without starting another persistent executor.

flowchart LR E["Existing skills Proven components"]:::confirmed --> G{"Review board Execution authorized"}:::open C["Saved feedback Historical examples"]:::confirmed --> G G -->|Revise| G G -->|Launch| S["Sol Medium Build /get-leads"]:::confirmed S --> T{"Trial and proof 100 / fresh review"}:::open T -->|Fix and retest| S T -->|All proof exists| D["Review hub Verified results"]:::open T -->|Input / budget gap| K["Resume point Partial or blocked"]:::open classDef confirmed fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#2E7D32,color:#000 classDef assumption fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#C2185B,color:#000 classDef open fill:#FFFFFF,stroke:#94A3B8,color:#000,stroke-dasharray:5 5

Existing skills + past corrections → review this board.
Execution is authorized; monitor the evidence and comment if needed.
Sol Medium builds → first-100 trial.
Material failures → fix → retry the same cases. Missing inputs, budget or capability → exact resume point.
Proof complete → one final review hub.

Six deliverables

Open any card for its success criteria, proof and constraints. Checkboxes reflect executor evidence; they are not approval controls.

Install a skill to unify leads

0 / 3 verified

One entry point uses proven helpers and existing corrections instead of restarting the workflow.

Inputs

Current request and saved session evidence/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/ColdEmail/.tmp/get-leads-lll-20260921/user_prompts_and_goal_relevant_info.mdProven helper/Users/agency/.agents/skills/personalise-eg-tetofedessel-a-tetofedo/SKILL.mdEarlier research and examples/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/ColdEmail/.tmp/get-leads-plan-20260921/evidence/report.md

Outputs

Canonical skill/Users/agency/.agents/skills/get-leads/SKILL.mdReusable method-review templateFinal path recorded by executorRecoverable archive and restore receiptFinal private path recorded by executor

Verification, constraints and evidence

Success criteria

A fresh task discovers and invokes /get-leads for new sourcing, existing-leads-only enrichment and resumption.
Prove with:
invocation receipts plus dependency/path validation.
The skill preserves the evidence-backed Hungarian rules and prior human corrections, while loading detail only when needed.
Prove with:
source-to-rule comparison against recovered historical examples and current feedback.
The canonical skill loads Hungarian detail from references/hungarian.md on demand. That file carries the nine owner-approved wording corrections and explicit p1/p2 distinction from the preserved language-pattern source. The trial prompt and tests retain short, evidence-backed fragments, target-only Kft. and ambiguous-name handling.
Only the two obsolete personalisation-eg-tetofedessel-a-tetofedo and personalisation-eg-tetofedessel-a-tetofedo-codex variants are recoverably archived after callers are checked.
Prove with:
backup checksums, caller check and a tested restore procedure.
Two obsolete variants retired to a recoverable private archive; active callers now invoke /get-leads. Archive SHA-256 and temporary restore-copy check passed. Receipt: var/get-leads/retirement-receipt.json.

Constraints

Do not erase originals, break unrelated skills or assume an unresolved helper such as `/scrape` exists.
Do not create competing user entry points, copy skills into unrelated runtimes or rebuild proven infrastructure without evidence of need.

In progress · skill installed as source

Canonical package created at ~/.agents/skills/get-leads/. Discovery, invocation, caller retirement and tests are being checked.

Show a method to approve work

0 / 3 verified

The first page explains what will happen before sourcing, scraping or personalisation begins.

Inputs

Current conversation and project filesResolved at invocationExisting lead inventory and prior runsResolved at invocation

Outputs

Editable method-review pageProtected run URL recorded by executorAcknowledged method revisionDurable decision record for that run

Verification, constraints and evidence

Success criteria

The page shows situation, existing/already-scraped counts, requested output, missing inputs, decisions, editable fields/toggles/annotations, every proposed Apify filter, scraper/model, exact extraction/generation prompts and labelled examples. Its results table starts empty.
Prove with:
actual page screenshot and content comparison against invocation inputs.
Actual method page shows 100 frozen candidate inputs, no Apify acquisition, scraper/model settings, full prompts, labelled examples and an empty actual-results table. Screenshot: var/get-leads/runs/2026-09-22-first100/method-ack-rev4.png.
Saving and reloading decisions, then explicit acknowledgement, records actor/time/revision/hash; the agent consumes that exact committed revision.
Prove with:
browser interaction and server/agent readback.
In-app browser acknowledged revision 4, hash 0bd3a852ee7e, by Sol trial reviewer at 22:40:07 UTC; SQLite readback matches and prior revision 3 acknowledgement is stale. Receipt: var/get-leads/verification/method-and-install.json.
Comments, silence, stale approval and unacknowledged method changes cannot authorize work. Rejection preserves the run. The normal sample stops for human feedback; remainder needs authorization.
Prove with:
gate tests including the narrowly recorded trial exception.
Method revisions are immutable and bound by revision/hash. Unit tests reject stale acknowledgement and a rejected latest revision, even after prior acknowledgement. The browser shows Acknowledge and Reject controls; the runner caps the frozen sample at 100 and requires a separate later instruction for more.

Constraints

Do not present example rows or unknown counts as actual sourced leads.
Do not spend before the relevant gate or carry the trial reviewer exception into another run.

Screenshot pending

Method-review page showing decisions, examples and empty results table.

Generate personalisations from verified evidence

0 / 5 verified

Python reuses sufficient company evidence, scrapes gaps, deduplicates and checks fit before generation.

Inputs

Acknowledged methodRun decision revisionOrdered candidate listFrozen source manifest for the trialReadable company evidenceExisting scrape or newly saved content

Outputs

Evidence-backed candidate resultsDurable run records and exportModel, usage and cost receiptsPrivate provider receipt ledger

Verification, constraints and evidence

Success criteria

Every candidate maps to a stable identity and a result, exclusion or failure with reason and evidence. Source URLs/content and original/generated values remain traceable.
Prove with:
all-row reconciliation and export comparison.
Luna Medium via OpenRouter is the default; explicit Gemini 2.5 Flash is supported only if currently available with required parameters. Requested/returned model, reasoning, actual provider, request ID, usage/cost and retries are recorded.
Prove with:
current provider metadata and real call receipts; mismatches fail validation.
The aggregate budget ledger proves reservations, actual and uncertain charges across scraper, generation, retries and tests. Insufficient or unknown balance prevents paid dispatch, and completed paid stages are reused.
Prove with:
bounded dispatch/refusal checks and final provider-to-ledger reconciliation within the authorized USD 15 ceiling.
One USD 15 ledger contains the prior USD 0.31 reserve, bounded per-call reservations, exact completion charges and held uncertain attempts. It records request/provider receipts and prevents dispatch beyond its conservative cap; focused tests cover reservation, uncertainty and cost overrun stop.
Weak evidence, malformed output, duplicate companies, rate limits, uncertain calls, budget exhaustion and interruption/resume have honest recoverable outcomes.
Prove with:
bounded failure/recovery tests; completed paid stages are reused.
Generated Hungarian preserves lessons from historical accepted/corrected examples and passes evidence, representative activity, grammar and rendered-sentence checks; unsupported values are flagged instead of invented. Independent adjudication accepts valid alternatives rather than requiring historical wording. Human review remains the normal quality gate.
Prove with:
source-to-rule comparison, per-row trial checks and independent adjudication of disputed trial wording; no general accuracy claim follows from the first-100 trial.

Constraints

Do not invent company activity, names or fit, obey instructions embedded in scraped pages, or silently replace a selected model.
Do not process more than the frozen first 100 trial candidates, retry an uncertain charge blindly or label a row outreach-ready without current suppression/prior-use/email checks.

Preserve edits in live results

0 / 3 verified

The review table fills as work proceeds, and saved human corrections remain authoritative.

Inputs

Candidate outcomes and progressPipeline stateHuman corrections and notesCommitted row revisions

Outputs

Live editable review tableProtected run URLDurable corrected exportRevision-linked export

Verification, constraints and evidence

Success criteria

Rows and counts update during processing, approximately every five seconds. The core columns are website URL, scraped-content link, personalisation1, greeting and initially empty notes. Failures show a reason and retry/terminal state.
Prove with:
before/during/after screenshots and all-row count comparison.
The private browser showed counts changing during paid processing; app.js polls every 5 seconds. The 100-row table shows all required columns, protected scrape links and empty initial notes. Private screenshot: var/get-leads/runs/2026-09-22-first100/trial-during.png.
Saved changes survive reload, a second authorized client, ongoing progress and restart. Stale writes cannot overwrite human edits, and saving/saved/failed states are visible.
Prove with:
two-client conflict test and durable-state readback.
Agent readback and export consume the same committed values/revision. The trial also exposes fit/reason, original/casual name, cég/vállalkozás, evidence and rendered opening/full-copy preview.
Prove with:
browser-to-export comparison and rendered example checks.
The UI and CSV call the same effective-row projection. A readback compared all 100 source IDs/positions between the frozen manifest, SQLite table and committed CSV; tests cover row edits and projection fields.

Constraints

Do not use browser localStorage or worker memory as the sole source of truth, or silently overwrite a correction.
Do not expose private leads, scrape evidence, exports or credentials through unprotected routes; preserve existing shared review/comment/image routes.

Screenshot pending

Actual table before, during and after processing with visible counts.

Screenshot pending

Saved correction visible on a second authorized browser/client after reload.

Keep history to reuse work

0 / 4 verified

Every invocation is findable, including pending, failed and abandoned runs.

Inputs

Run inputs, settings and outcomesDurable run stateUser feedback and learned rulesVersioned corrections

Outputs

Permanent run-history indexProtected history URLMachine-readable run recordsDurable structured historyOne final review hubPrimary protected review URLService ownership and recovery recordPrivate canonical repository/service, route, access, store and deployment inventory

Verification, constraints and evidence

Success criteria

History records source/order/filters, scraper/model/prompt versions, counts, cost, evidence, decisions, corrections and lessons from the moment a run is created.
Prove with:
pending and completed run records plus index screenshot.
A second invocation finds prior work and reuses eligible evidence without duplicate processing; resume retains its run ID. A genuinely new run links reused inputs/results.
Prove with:
two-invocation/restart test and revision comparison.
The canonical service/repository, route owner, authentication boundary, durable store, deployment path and practical rollback are recorded before deployment or private-data writes. The implementation extends existing authorized infrastructure where viable.
Prove with:
actual configuration/readback and a narrow recovery receipt; unresolved dependencies block only the affected deployment or persistence criterion.
Page, API, row edits, history, evidence and exports enforce existing authorized-user access, including direct-object URLs. Unrelated review routes survive deployment and a subsequent publish.
Prove with:
authorized/unauthorized read and write checks, backing-store revision readback and old-page/comment/image route checks.

Constraints

Do not confuse scraped, generated, reserved and contacted statuses or equate reuse with outreach eligibility.
Do not expose raw private transcripts or make private lead data public to satisfy hosting.

Screenshot pending

Run-history index linking a pending run, the trial and its final review table.

Prove usability with 100 candidates

0 / 4 verified

Sol invokes the installed skill through the browser and closes the friction revealed by a real bounded trial.

Inputs

Installed Get Leads skill/Users/agency/.agents/skills/get-leads/SKILL.mdSource task and edited plancodex://threads/01a0c37e-068b-7333-be1e-9d673b91c121Historical verified extraction/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/ColdEmail/.tmp/get-leads-plan-20260921/evidence

Outputs

Frozen first-100 manifestPrivate manifest with identity/order/hashReviewed 100-candidate outcomesProtected trial tableFriction fixes and retest evidencePrivate verification report linked from hub

Verification, constraints and evidence

Success criteria

Freeze positions 1–100 with source IDs/query/order/time/hash before processing. Reconcile the same identities across table, export and history; retry the same identity.
Prove with:
manifest and 100-row outcome reconciliation.
Frozen manifest has 100 ordered, distinct identities with candidate SHA-256 2e4f361f9dd22bde1492e73fe58fc084ea0c5ddadcbf6b7f6b43ffe64202d6ad. Method revision binds the same hash; all 100 positions/source IDs match the SQLite table and CSV export exactly.
Sol uses the installed skill and ChatGPT browser for the method → scrape → fit → personalise workflow without undocumented manual repairs. A fresh bounded reviewer evaluates proposed wording and adjudicates discrepancies as real errors or acceptable alternatives.
Prove with:
invocation/browser receipts and row-level review report.
No unresolved material pipeline/UI fault or unsupported personalised claim is presented as successful. Demonstrated friction is fixed in the skill, and affected cases are rerun against the same manifest.
Prove with:
expected/actual issue records and passing retests, with honest exclusions/failures retained.
The final board, review hub and handoff agree on verified, failed, pending and untested outcomes.
Prove with:
criterion-to-evidence audit, screenshots of actual results and an execution-side-effect record showing no campaign or message mutation, using the actual tool/provider ledger or restricted-capability readback without accessing unrelated accounts merely to prove a negative.

Constraints

Do not substitute candidate 101 for a rejection/failure, promise 100 accepted leads or assert 95% general reliability from this trial. If fewer than 100 inputs are recoverable, D6 remains PARTIAL or BLOCKED, its 100-identity criterion stays unchecked and the whole run cannot be COMPLETE; expose the exact shortfall and resume point. Other independently proved criteria may pass.
Do not create, edit, upload, activate or resume campaigns, send messages, or expand into the historical 1,200-lead project.

Screenshot pending

Browser invocation and actual trial results with counts and rendered personalisation.

Trial running · 100 / 100 identities frozen

Existing lead bank, construction-contractors niche, ordered by source occurrence ID with one candidate per company. Candidate hash 2e4f361f9dd22bde1492e73fe58fc084ea0c5ddadcbf6b7f6b43ffe64202d6ad. Method revision 4 is acknowledged. Website evidence was cached for 81 identities. Luna hit repeated upstream rate limits on candidates 3 and 4. Explicit Gemini method revision 6 was reviewed in the browser and is processing the remaining eligible positions. All four earlier identities remain in place with their uncertain, lost or rate-limited outcomes; no candidate 101 is substituted.

Authority and operating rules

Who can act, when, and how

Confirmed: Matt selected /lll with Sol Medium, replacing the earlier requirement for an Astra High builder and a second persistent executor. One pinned executor uses gpt-5.6-sol, reasoning medium; no silent substitution. It may use bounded subagents, including a fresh independent reviewer, but owns the combined result.
Now: Execution authorized by Matt’s newer “go ahead” instruction. The trial-only method reviewer exception applies to this run. Normal future runs still require explicit human method acknowledgement.
Execution authority after Launch: create and test the canonical skill and supporting scripts/template, recoverably archive only the two obsolete variants, reuse authorized services, run the bounded first-100 trial and repair demonstrated friction. Ordinary reversible implementation choices are the executor's responsibility.
Normal Get Leads gates: human method review → process up to 100 candidates (or smaller requested total) → stop for human sample feedback → revise → remainder only when authorized. Saved edits alone are not approval.
Trial-only exception: Sol may use the ChatGPT browser to review/fill/acknowledge the trial method so the first-100 test can finish unattended. This does not approve remainder work, future runs or outreach. Human review of final output remains available.
Coordination: parent waits for completion or a reported blocker without inspecting ongoing child work. One check 20 minutes after this Sol executor launches, only if still running; at most a bounded helpful intervention. The executor keeps the board useful. Silence is not evidence of a stall.

Personalisation, budget and privacy

Hungarian: use concise evidence-backed fragments, evaluated inside the approved sentence. Trial copy is objective/formal; a verified named greeting where suitable, otherwise Jó napot kívánok. Show two impersonal variants when the source copy calls for them. Normal runs inherit their reviewed greeting/copy.
Business noun: cég only when Kft. or Korlátolt felelősségű társaság belongs to the target business, excluding footer vendors/other companies; otherwise vállalkozás, without inferring sole-trader status. Verify deterministic cases.
Casual name: branding/logo first, domain second, legal text as a clue. Preserve original/evidence, flag ambiguity and distinguish manufacturers, retailers and installers. Do not blindly strip legal names.
Personalisation2: optional and unreviewed. Matt reviewed personalisation1 only; that does not establish personalisation2 quality.
Generation model: validate openai/gpt-5.6-luna with Medium reasoning and explicit google/gemini-2.5-flash against current provider metadata before paid use. Do not hard-code historical availability or retire dates as current facts. Use provider-specific request settings, rather than copying Luna reasoning settings to Gemini. Capture live metadata and require parameter compatibility (OpenRouter provider.require_parameters: true) and the existing authorized privacy policy on every route. Same-model provider failover is allowed only when those requirements remain satisfied and the actual route is recorded. Do not configure alternate-model fallback. A bounded real validation call happens only after the applicable method gate and consumes the same budget.
Budget: one durable ledger covers all agents, scraping, generation, retries and tests under USD 15 total unless raised. Capture a durable pending attempt before dispatch; reserve bounded maximum costs from current applicable pricing, conservatively resolving conflicting price sources. Reconcile actual/uncertain costs through provider generation receipts where available, leave ambiguous attempts uncertain when no authoritative lookup is possible, cache successes, and stop paid dispatch if balance is insufficient/unknown. Preserve progress and exact resume point.
Privacy and simplicity: extend existing supported scraper/helper/review infrastructure as little as needed. Use existing authorized access; no new private recipients. Keep raw transcripts local. Preserve unrelated work and coordinate concurrent ownership.
Assumptions to verify, not facts: sufficient source inputs are available; reusable helpers still work; protected cross-device persistence can be extended; requested model/provider supports required settings. Resolve using source inventory, installed-path checks, canonical service ownership/recovery records, real access/persistence tests and current provider receipts. These are executor discovery dependencies after Launch, not invented human approval gates. No essential additional human choice is known before board review.

Source brief and executor handoff

Parent: /root, local Codex task 01a07ec5-9b94-7c23-95f5-8a89ee994b47.
Read the refreshed current-session gist and user_prompts_and_goal_relevant_info.md in /Users/agency/Documents/Agty/ColdEmail/.tmp/get-leads-lll-20260921/ and the prior trial gist/report in /Users/agency/Documents/Agty/ColdEmail/.tmp/get-leads-plan-20260921/evidence/. Use clean dialogue as requirements, not proof of historical tool results.
Read the edited trial source plan /Users/agency/.codex/plans/01a0c37e-068b-7333-be1e-9d673b91c121/01a0c380-e62e-7433-8a59-8f459a0b8dc6/PLAN.md. Refresh changing inventory facts, not unchanged extraction. Latest request/model and this contract control historical contradictions.
Board local path: /Users/agency/Documents/Agty/ColdEmail/outputs/get-leads-verification-2026-09-21/index.html.
Stable run URL: https://review.clientsflow.hu/get-leads-verification-2026-09-21-v1/. Comment document identity remains get-leads-plan-20260921 to retain earlier user feedback; distinguish old-page comments from the current contract.
One Sol Medium executor is active under native /goal, with this board, the frozen manifest and the parent return path. No second persistent executor is needed.
Executor maintains the HTML source and republishes this same run URL after meaningful updates. Base plan black; agent progress/evidence blue; passed criteria green; failures/blocks red. Check native criterion boxes in source only after linked proof exists. Keep current item, counters and screenshot slots truthful. A green job or saved marker alone is not proof.
Report path reserved for executor: /Users/agency/Documents/Agty/ColdEmail/.tmp/get-leads-lll-20260921/executor-report.md. Return once through /to-my-parent, after /wrap-up; suspected blockers first use /am-i-blocked. Completion requires all essential deliverables and proof, with exact resume points for anything irreducibly blocked.